I haven't commented on the horrific cop killings in my hometown because really, what was there to say? A dog pissed on a carpet, someone called 9/11 because an argument escalated, and three cops were dead. It seemed to speak for itself, that Richard Poplawski was dangerously unstable and never should have been allowed to own a weapon, let alone an AK-47.
But then...
Harlan Ellison once commented that every time a mass murder or serial killing took place, the media would find a neighbor or co-worker to say something along the lines of "he was such a good Christian boy. Worked down at the plant, took three sugars in his coffee. Kept to himself. Sent half his paycheck home to his mama (wife/kids/parents in another country. I have no idea why he killed 147 people, cut off their privates, and sent them in a mailing tube to his senator, but he's a good Christian boy, he is." It's inevitable. I'm sure Ed Gein's neighbors thought he was such a nice, quiet guy, and I wasn't surprised at initial media reports that Richard Poplawski was just an ordinary joe.
Then the template changed. Poplawski wasn't an ordinary guy. He was a right-wing conspiracy theorist who posted on Neo Nazi web sites and stockpiled guns because "the Zionist media" had taken over. Just like the Knoxville shooter, who was out to kill as many liberals as possible and decided to start at a Unitarian church during a children's pageant, Poplawski had gone well beyond the fringe.
And just like Jim Adkisson's hatred of liberals and dependence on right-wing hatemongers for his ideas has basically been lost (and the Knoxville church shooting disappeared off the front pagers as soon as it became clear that no, this *wasn't* a nice safe conservative Christian church, but Unitarian Universalist Welcoming Congregation that welcomed all comers, including Adkisson's abused former wife), so it's happening with Poplawski. There's been little mention in the national media of his Neo Nazi connections, or his best friend's bland comments about him hating the Zionist-controlled media, or how *of course* Poplawski was convinced the feds were going to take his precious guns. The fact that Poplawski was, to be blunt, an anti-Semitic gun nut who hated blacks and was about one step away from buying a truckload of fertilizer and blowing up the City-County Building as a way of igniting a Turner Diaries-style race war, is being buried.
I only hope that this doesn't mean we're headed for another spate of militias, domestic terrorism, and "citizen courts" over the next few years....
But then...
Harlan Ellison once commented that every time a mass murder or serial killing took place, the media would find a neighbor or co-worker to say something along the lines of "he was such a good Christian boy. Worked down at the plant, took three sugars in his coffee. Kept to himself. Sent half his paycheck home to his mama (wife/kids/parents in another country. I have no idea why he killed 147 people, cut off their privates, and sent them in a mailing tube to his senator, but he's a good Christian boy, he is." It's inevitable. I'm sure Ed Gein's neighbors thought he was such a nice, quiet guy, and I wasn't surprised at initial media reports that Richard Poplawski was just an ordinary joe.
Then the template changed. Poplawski wasn't an ordinary guy. He was a right-wing conspiracy theorist who posted on Neo Nazi web sites and stockpiled guns because "the Zionist media" had taken over. Just like the Knoxville shooter, who was out to kill as many liberals as possible and decided to start at a Unitarian church during a children's pageant, Poplawski had gone well beyond the fringe.
And just like Jim Adkisson's hatred of liberals and dependence on right-wing hatemongers for his ideas has basically been lost (and the Knoxville church shooting disappeared off the front pagers as soon as it became clear that no, this *wasn't* a nice safe conservative Christian church, but Unitarian Universalist Welcoming Congregation that welcomed all comers, including Adkisson's abused former wife), so it's happening with Poplawski. There's been little mention in the national media of his Neo Nazi connections, or his best friend's bland comments about him hating the Zionist-controlled media, or how *of course* Poplawski was convinced the feds were going to take his precious guns. The fact that Poplawski was, to be blunt, an anti-Semitic gun nut who hated blacks and was about one step away from buying a truckload of fertilizer and blowing up the City-County Building as a way of igniting a Turner Diaries-style race war, is being buried.
I only hope that this doesn't mean we're headed for another spate of militias, domestic terrorism, and "citizen courts" over the next few years....
no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 01:52 pm (UTC)From:The British crown did actually try and disarm the colonies, and to restrict their access to things that colonists could use to protect themselves from British soldiers who weren't above exploiting their authority and abusing their power. (As some percentage of all policing forces does, after all,)
The second amendment originally read something more to the tune of "Congress shall pass no law restricting a citizen's right to keep and take up arms against his country." The amendment is there so that the American people won't ever become a slave state, at the mercy of its military. At least that's what the founding fathers intended when they wrote it.
So the question of using fully automatic rifles to kill people is not actually a swaying factor in gun ownership when you take into account that we are a nation grown out of revolution and open warfare against a colonizing power. The guns in question are supposed to be able to kill people -- just in case people who need killing begin to make problems, and ordinary citizens need to stand up and resist.
It's never quite as simple as extremists on either side of the argument make it, the gun issue.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 02:13 pm (UTC)From:What it is, is one of the most reliable battle rifles ever made. It's a 60-year old design that is cheap and easy to make, reliable in almost all combat situations. It's a much better gun than almost anything in its class.
Fully automatic guns, aka machine guns, have been illegal for civilians to own (with a very, very, few exceptions for collectors and museums) since the days of Prohibition.
Registering and licencing guns and gun owners won't stop gun crime. Criminals break laws: it's what they do. So, breaking a law against gun ownership isn't going to stop a criminal intent on having a gun. Outlawing civilian gun ownership entirely won't stop it either -- there are plenty of people who are willing and able to steal guns.
They are also not all that difficult to make, if you've got a machine shop and a bit of knowledge, and there are plenty of people who'd be happy to custom make guns for ca$h -- in fact there already are.
----
The other reason that the Colonial rebels were so adamant against giving up their guns was they needed them for self-defence and hunting. I don't know about you, but if I was a pioneer in a country with assorted large predators, I'd want a damned good rifle (and a shotgun, a varmint gun, and a pistol or two) within loaded and within reach at all times.
----
As a slightly physically handicapped gay man, I'd like to be able to carry a concealed handgun right here and now in urban America. I recommend you check out The Pink Pistols
no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 03:24 pm (UTC)From:Yes. You are correct. It is only "semi-automatic".
It takes specialized knowledge and tools to convert one to fully automatic.
Say, a ten year old with a nail file.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 03:49 pm (UTC)From: