ellid: (Default)
I just found a sample of Lorrie Moore's latest novel, A Gate at the Stairs, on Amazon.com. It's supposedly from the point of view of a college student looking for work.

Please, o all-wise flist, go read the first few pages. Then tell me if I'm completely crazy to find this critically lauded book a precious, pretentious, oh-so-literary creation that bears as much resemblance to the inner monologue of a college student looking for work as it does to the collected works of Marie Corelli?

Thank you.
I received an ARC of A Gate at the Stairs, and read enough of it to evaluate it for our selection list, but didn't finish it. If I want 9/11 rumination, I can get it closer to home :->

I haven't read any Marie Corelli. What's her story?
Marie Corelli (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Corelli) was a popular novelist of the Victorian and Edwardian era. Her work is widely regarded as overblown, silly, and melodramatic, but she sold hundreds of thousands of copies and became extremely rich. Her best known book is probably the splendidly named The Sorrows of Satan. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sorrows_of_Satan)
"The Sorrows of Satan" sounds like it's worth a read! Or, as Scott thought a fanfic title.
Sounds more like Danielle Steel to me :->
This may be why I dropped out of my alumnae book club. They *never* chose anything but literary fiction, uplifting non-fiction about heroic doctors, and the occasional self-help. It took my best friend years to talk them into reading My Name is Asher Lev, and I'm still shocked that they actually agreed to read The Devil in the White City.

Completely OT - I just read Thunderstruck! by Erik Larson. Fabulous book juxtaposing the invention of the wireless and the use of same to apprehend a criminal. Loved it.
Have you read Larson's other books? Devil in the White City is fascinating and Isaac's Storm is just amazing, especially for a weather/disaster junkie like me.

Have you seen this? http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/book-review-mary-gordons-the-love-of-my-youth-a-melancholy-roman-holiday/2011/04/08/AFeAlb7D_story.html. Interesting review with a take on the whole literary fiction thing.
I read and enjoyed both "Devil in the White City" and "Thunderstruck".

Do you read much non-fiction (apart from textile/costume, I mean?)
Oh, tons. History is a favorite, but I have books on religion (my MA is in religion and it's still a big interest), art, sociology, true crime, and so on. Until recently I read more non-fiction than fiction, although the balance has shifted somewhat since I got my e-reader.
I'm glad to hear it :) It's fun for me to run into another person who reads heavily of non-fiction, there seem to be few of us in the casual reading world.

Are you on Goodreads or the like?

Date: 2011-04-19 10:12 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] roonilwazlib6.livejournal.com
I sure as hell didn't think that eloquently in college, which I finished only two years ago. My thoughts tended to be along the lines of, "Why is beer so effing expensive" and "I wonder how I'll get back from the party tonight."

Date: 2011-04-19 10:24 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] ellid.livejournal.com
*snerk*

Date: 2011-04-19 10:16 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] hugh-mannity.livejournal.com
Gack! Total wankery of the first water.

Date: 2011-04-19 10:25 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] ellid.livejournal.com
Thank you for using "of the first water." I love that phrase and almost never see it any more :)

Date: 2011-04-19 11:06 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] hugh-mannity.livejournal.com
Always happy to oblige, Ma'am *doffs cap*

Date: 2011-04-19 10:25 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] ladyaelfwynn.livejournal.com
Okay. I got through two pages before I though, "Bored now!" I don't really know what the point is after two pages. Am I supposed to care about this character? So she left the farm and feels dazzled by college life, whoopee!

I give this a resounding, "Meh" and I suppose there are people that find this sort of thing a good read. But, I wouldn't be so crass as to make snide comments about those that like this sort of thing being narrow minded, pseudo-intellectual snobs. I'd say something like, "If you like stories about women in college or women's coming of age stories in modern (or whatever timeperiod) Illinois, then this is a books you should check out."

Date: 2011-04-19 10:44 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] ellid.livejournal.com
*nods*

Date: 2011-04-19 11:13 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] lherelenfeline.livejournal.com
YOu already know what I think of Moore and her writing. Not surprised at the quality of this.

Date: 2011-04-20 03:32 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] a-c-fiorucci.livejournal.com
After reading the first couple of pages, I want to send the book _Among Others_ to both that author and the "reviewer" from the NYT. And watch their tiny little worldview explode.

(Fantasy. Written by a woman (Jo Walton). About a Welsh teen girl going to an English boarding school after her twin dies, who is constructing her identity by reading every science fiction/fantasy book she can get her hands on. Also, with fairies and witches.)

Date: 2011-04-20 11:04 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] ellid.livejournal.com
Do iiiiittttt. Doooo ittttt.....

Date: 2011-04-20 10:41 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Not a book for me. It's not actually entirely uninteresting, and I did read all the pages there. It's tolerably well-written for its genre. But I don't want to read it any more than my father could get through the first chapter of "Game of Thrones".

I think it's also worth noting in the context of the GB article, that I absolutely don't think the things that makes Moore's introductary section overwrought, pretentious and dull (to me) are gendered - it is dull for exactly the same reasons that that sort of fiction by a man about a male student is often overwrought, pretentious and dull. It's just that Moore's is more likely to be dismissed as ChickLit (it's clear that she isn't writing sex and shopping books), and the man's to be heralded as "the next Roth". In that sense, though GB looks at her only as a woman writing books for women (and thus probably about shoes), the fact that a quick Google tells me that though I've never heard of Moore "A Gate at the Stairs" was positively reviewed by the major British papers as a literary novel (and by men) suggests that within the confines of the genre she writes in, she is clearly very good indeed.

Date: 2011-04-20 11:10 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] ellid.livejournal.com
Roomie and I were talking about this last night, and we're convinced that the reason so many literary novels are so unappealing is the rise of the MFA (Master of Fine Arts) writing program at American universities. These are supposed to teach aspiring writers how to write. Unfortunately, the average graduate has zero idea of how to *sell* what s/he has written (one program, at Columbia University of all places, actually brought in a thriller writer looking for ghostwriters who was offering the students $250 as the advance, which is less than most markets offer for a short story), and ends up teaching somewhere in an MFA program.

Even worse, the students who actually want to write commercial fiction are winnowed out early. That many of today's classics started out as commercial fiction that proved too popular to ignore doesn't seem to register....

Date: 2011-04-20 03:26 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
You may have a point there... The main purpose of MFAs, as far as I can see - and indeed their UK equivalents - often appears to be that they enable people who want to write a certain type of fiction to have external support in doing that for a year, whereby support is possibly more important in terms of student loans, validation, an excuse to spend time on it and imposed deadlines, than actual learning dependent upon the course itself.

There are exceptions, such as the UEA Creative writing MA (particulary the 70s - early 90s), but even it hardly sees the majority of its students go on to become Ian McEwan and Tracy Chevalier, and concentrates and a particular sort of fiction.

Date: 2011-04-20 03:39 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] ellid.livejournal.com
I think it all comes down to what writers have known for centuries: the only way to learn to write is to write. Whether it's essays, blogposts, fanfiction, or The Great American Novel, an aspiring writer is best served by sitting down and writing *something* on a regular schedule. Eventually the technique will come.

Also, I think one major problem is that a LOT of writers have forgotten that, above and beyond everything else, readers want an entertaining story. If I pick up a book and don't like the characters, the prose style, or the plot, I'm going to put that book back down and pick up something else. All too many authors, especially the ones coming out of college programs, seem to have forgotten this. Fine technique and quirky characters will not compensate if the plot is boring or the characters are composed of nothing but their quirks.

My reaction

Date: 2011-04-20 04:01 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] animangel.livejournal.com
Well, I didn't find it particularly bad, although it wasn't exactly good either. It felt sort of (dare I use the word) "hipster".

Some of her details made me go "Huh?" (Umm... cloudy plasma from eating cheese? Really? Also, I can state from experience someone being two inches taller than you is NOT enough of a height difference to see up their nostrils - not that most of us would even try....)

Plus, having *not* read the introduction I had no idea what this book was about. I mean, I don't even have an idea as to genre. In my (maybe not-so-humble) opinion, one should give a clue to that in the first few pages, right?

So, yeah.
Page generated Feb. 2nd, 2026 12:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios